|
TheLogicJunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm on page 20, and what I essentially take issue with is how certain aspects of reality are labeled with words, because the official terminologies you invoke are themselves not only loaded, but misleading, in my mind.
...Mind you, I'm not blaming you for these terms; you're just the messenger... I'm blaming whoever came up with the terms to describe the concepts.
jeffsmithluedke (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Awesome. Let me know what you think.
TheLogicJunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
...because, apparently, there's no substitute for critiquing a book, than to actually read the damn thing.
TheLogicJunkie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Okay; now I'm going to have to give your book a read.
Brandt761 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
But what the hell is that supposed to mean, "language using transcendental relationships"?
fortunatus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
A context dropping Objectivist?
Oh noes!
dackjaniels555 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Me to =D
mconn2112 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What did you expect from a guy that takes a minute and a half to define book and memoir and then calls you deluded 1:49 into the vid.
Fuck!! Now I am so engaged in this exchange I must buy your book to keep up. ;-)
tmafkap (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I like your background music.
42662113 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey, I apologise for that "dog transcending its essential dogness" remark--I'm just gonna have to read the actual book myself. |
